The Wall Street Journal ran a piece yesterday on JustPaid, a 9-person Mountain View startup. They used OpenClaw and Claude Code to stand up seven AI agents that write code, review it, and run QA around the clock. In one month: 10 major features shipped. Each one would have taken a human engineer a month or more. This story is getting passed around as proof that the autonomous engineering team is h
Introduction I've been seeing more developers say that Codex has become easier to use, more cost-effective, or simply a better fit for some workflows than it used to be. This is not a "Claude Code is bad, everyone should switch" article. I still use Claude Code at work, and if cost were less of a factor in my personal setup, I would probably be using both more actively. If you're already comfort
Hello everyone! I wanted to write this article to share my experience with agentic coding without Claude and Codex, I started dabbling with agentic coding a few months ago when Claude had decent limits on the 20$ plan, You prompt the agent: I want e2e tests, and it will study the codebase and implement them. When I've started hitting limits on Claude code, and this is not a secret that they reduc
I went into a bunch of OpenClaw discussions expecting the usual advice about subagents: better prompts, cleaner folders, maybe some heroic config. What I found was more interesting. The OpenClaw setups that actually seem to hold up are not just "one agent with more prompts." They are separate services with separate trust zones. The pattern that keeps showing up looks like this: a librarian agent a
E aí, gurizada! De uns tempos pra cá, eu percebi um burburinho enorme em torno de uma ferramenta que tem chamado a atenção, e não é por menos: o OpenClaw. Eu, que vivo mergulhado nesse universo de IA e automação, gravei um vídeo recentemente, que está lá no meu canal, assista no YouTube, justamente pra desmistificar essa parada. E hoje, vim aqui no Dev.to pra gente conversar um pouco mais sobre o