More rules should mean better output. That's the intuition. I spent weeks building a comprehensive CLAUDE.md — 200 lines covering naming conventions, security rules, error handling, architectural patterns, import ordering, type safety requirements, and more. I was proud of it. I'd thought through every scenario. Then I scored the output. 79.0 / 100. My carefully crafted documentation was actively
Introduction Picture two doctors updating the same patient record at the same time - one in São Paulo, the other in London. Both are offline. When connectivity returns, whose changes prevail? This is not a hypothetical. It is the everyday reality of distributed systems: multiple nodes, no shared clock, no guaranteed network. The conventional answer has long been locking - one node waits while an
Introduction Some code works. Some code lasts. The difference rarely comes down to typing speed, syntax mastery, or how many nights you're willing to push through. It comes down to how you think about a problem before you write a single line. Big-O notation is a mathematical framework that describes how an algorithm performs as its input grows. In plain terms, it answers one question:
If you use ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Copilot, or Gemini daily, it feels like you're talking to a person. It remembers what you said three messages ago. It references the project details you shared yesterday. It feels like the model has a persistent brain that is learning about you. But it’s a lie. From an architectural standpoint, an LLM is the most "forgetful" piece of software you will ever use. Ev
Most symbolic systems rely on multiple primitives. Addition, multiplication, exponentials, logarithms — each plays a different role in structuring expressions. But what happens if you force everything through a single operator? This idea becomes concrete with the EML operator: eml(x, y) = exp(x) − ln(y) In theory, this operator can express all elementary functions. But theory doesn’t tell us what
Have you ever looked at code you wrote six months ago and thought: "Who wrote this monster?"? Relax, it happens to all of us. In software engineering, writing code that a machine understands is the easy part. The real challenge is writing code that other humans (including your future self) can understand, maintain, and scale. This is exactly where Software Design Principles come into play. In this
Part 1 of 5 in The New Engineering Contract — what it means to lead engineers when AI is doing more of the coding. SWE-CI tested 18 AI models across 71 consecutive commits. Most broke something on commit 47 they'd already broken on commit 1. That's not an intelligence problem. That's a learning system that isn't learning. A paper made me uncomfortable this month. Not because of what it found about