Il y a quelques années, au lycée (entre 2022 et 2025), un professeur m'a donné le déclic pour l'informatique. Je passais mes journées sur des forums à décortiquer le fonctionnement des réseaux et de la sécurité. Mais j'ai vite été frappé par une réalité : apprendre la tech aujourd'hui demande souvent de "donner un organe". Il faut une connexion fibre, un abonnement coûteux, et surtout, on laisse s
More rules should mean better output. That's the intuition. I spent weeks building a comprehensive CLAUDE.md — 200 lines covering naming conventions, security rules, error handling, architectural patterns, import ordering, type safety requirements, and more. I was proud of it. I'd thought through every scenario. Then I scored the output. 79.0 / 100. My carefully crafted documentation was actively
A correct JWT verifier does eight things. Most production verifiers I have read do four or five of them. The other three or four get skipped because the library defaults aren't loud about them, the docs gloss over them, or someone copied a "it works" snippet from Stack Overflow circa 2018. Here is the full eight-check list, what each one prevents, and what it looks like to implement them with stru
Have you ever looked at code you wrote six months ago and thought: "Who wrote this monster?"? Relax, it happens to all of us. In software engineering, writing code that a machine understands is the easy part. The real challenge is writing code that other humans (including your future self) can understand, maintain, and scale. This is exactly where Software Design Principles come into play. In this
Part 1 of 5 in The New Engineering Contract — what it means to lead engineers when AI is doing more of the coding. SWE-CI tested 18 AI models across 71 consecutive commits. Most broke something on commit 47 they'd already broken on commit 1. That's not an intelligence problem. That's a learning system that isn't learning. A paper made me uncomfortable this month. Not because of what it found about