Background A nasty surprise Last summer while trying to deliver a feature for one of our customers, I encountered a nasty situation. The software we were developing, depended on a production grade license of Gurobi. People were on vacations except of my team and some unrelated staff, so developing the feature was in principle blocked. As I learnt due to some other situations, research
When you build a PowerShell project from multiple files, the natural structure is clear: enums first, then classes, then functions. Each group has its own place, and as long as dependencies only flow in one direction, that structure works perfectly. But sometimes a function depends on a class, and that class calls the function. There is no longer a clean boundary between the two groups — they need
A deep, opinionated, practical guide for the human running a software business alone. Hard-won lessons, decision frameworks, and the actual mechanics of going from idea → first dollar → first $10K MRR → first $1M ARR — without a co-founder, without a team for as long as possible, and without burning out. If you read only one section first, read §2 Mindset, §4 Validation, and §6 Distribution-First.
The drift problem nobody told you about If you have used Claude Code, Cursor, Aider, or any other AI coding agent across more than two projects, you have felt this: You start project A. You copy the .agents/ folder (or CLAUDE.md, or .cursorrules) from your last project. You tweak two things. Done. You start project B six weeks later. You copy from project A. You tweak three things this time. Now
Cross-posted from the Stigmem blog. Today we're releasing stigmem v1.0: A stable, open-source specification and reference implementation for a federated knowledge fabric for AI agents. Stigmem = Stigmergy + Memory. Stigmergy (Greek stigma — mark; ergon — work) is the coordination mechanism you see in ant colonies and termite mounds: agents don't communicate directly with each other. Instead, they
More rules should mean better output. That's the intuition. I spent weeks building a comprehensive CLAUDE.md — 200 lines covering naming conventions, security rules, error handling, architectural patterns, import ordering, type safety requirements, and more. I was proud of it. I'd thought through every scenario. Then I scored the output. 79.0 / 100. My carefully crafted documentation was actively
I still remember the message. A developer on my team - sharp, careful - pinged me: "My Claude Code bill spiked $200 this week. Same workflow. Something's off." I had no answer. The built-in usage view showed session totals. The web billing page showed monthly aggregates. But neither could answer the only question that mattered: which specific turn ate the money? How do I improve the way I use Clau
TestSprite MCP Server: Ulasan Developer Indonesia — Pengujian Otomatis AI yang Mengubah Cara Kita QA Ditulis oleh developer Indonesia setelah mencoba TestSprite langsung pada proyek nyata Sebagai developer yang sudah berkecimpung di dunia web development selama beberapa tahun, saya selalu mencari cara untuk mempercepat proses quality assurance tanpa mengorbankan ketelitian. Ketika mendengar tent