A Haystack pipeline can be perfectly wired and still unsafe. The retriever returns documents. Every component did its job. But if untrusted text moved through the pipeline as ordinary context, the trust boundary was lost. That is the problem this post is about. Not bad Python. A valid component connection only says: this value fits the next component It does not say: this value is safe to influen
The Problem Most engineers deploy to Kubernetes by clicking buttons in a UI. I built Archnet — a fully automated Internal Developer Platform What is an Internal Developer Platform? An IDP is the infrastructure layer that sits between your code How code gets deployed How secrets are managed How the system monitors itself How failures get detected and fixed Most companies pay Humanitec or Backsta
We had ArgoCD running perfectly. Every deployment was reconciled from Git. Drift detection worked. Rollbacks were one-click. Our GitOps setup was clean. Developers still couldn't provision a staging environment without pinging the platform team. That gap — between "GitOps in place" and "developers can actually self-serve" — is where most platform engineering teams get stuck. GitOps solves a real p
Comparison: Haystack 2.0 vs. RAGatouille 0.3 for Building High-Accuracy RAG Pipelines for Developer Docs Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become the standard for building LLM-powered tools that answer questions using private or domain-specific data. For developer documentation (dev docs) — which includes technical jargon, versioned APIs, code snippets, and structured reference material —