Tbh I had no idea this was even a thing until recently. I've been working with Rails for a while now and somehow never came across it. So let me explain it the way I understood it. You know how we normally do associations in Rails, User has many Posts, Post belongs to User. Two different models, two different tables. Simple. But what if a model needs to reference itself? Like same table, same mode
Comments
Why I built another Ruby test runner inspired by Playwright Test Ruby already has great testing tools. If you are building Rails applications today, you probably use one of these combinations: RSpec + Capybara Minitest + Capybara Rails system tests Maybe Selenium, Cuprite, Ferrum, or Playwright through Ruby bindings These tools are mature, battle-tested, and widely used. So the natural question
Book: TypeScript in Production Also by me: The TypeScript Library — the 5-book collection My project: Hermes IDE | GitHub — an IDE for developers who ship with Claude Code and other AI coding tools Me: xgabriel.com | GitHub You have seen the shape of this incident before. A 500 lands in production. The frontend says "checkout failed". The Hono service that owns /checkout called the prici
Every observability vendor has bolted "AI" to their landing page. Half of those features are genuine improvements. The other half are autocomplete in a costume. After a few years of running these tools across enterprise estates, here is where AI-augmented SRE actually pays off, where it doesn't, and what we'd advise teams adopting it today. The single most defensible use case. A medium-sized estat
Iris v0.4.0 ships today. It's the release where protocol-native eval crosses from "deterministic rules" into "semantic scoring" — without giving up any of what made the deterministic layer work. Three headline features plus a lot of infrastructure work that quietly compounds. I'll go through each, why it matters, and how it fits the thesis. Heuristic rules catch a lot: length, keyword overlap, PII