This is, admittedly, more of a personal ramble than a technical article. For the past few years, I have become something of a Crystal believer. Looking at recent movements in Ruby from the perspective of a Crystal believer, I sometimes find myself thinking: “That is the area Crystal people have been digging into for years, and Ruby’s real strengths are not really there, are they…?” I have not been
An opinionated list of Python frameworks, libraries, tools, and resources
Tbh I had no idea this was even a thing until recently. I've been working with Rails for a while now and somehow never came across it. So let me explain it the way I understood it. You know how we normally do associations in Rails, User has many Posts, Post belongs to User. Two different models, two different tables. Simple. But what if a model needs to reference itself? Like same table, same mode
很多团队的网络监控并不算差。 链路可用率有、接口带宽有、CPU 和内存有、异常告警也接进了企业微信、飞书和短信。但真正出了事，复盘时还是会出现同一句话：当时知道出问题了，但没有把现场留住。 这就是为什么越来越多团队开始关注网络回溯分析系统。 它解决的不是“能不能看到告警”这个初级问题，而是更关键的两个问题： 告警发生时，能不能快速还原到底是哪一段流量、哪一条路径、哪一种会话出了问题 事故结束后，能不能基于证据复盘，而不是靠聊天记录和印象拼凑过程 对云上和混合云场景来说，这件事尤其重要。因为链路更长、设备更多、路径更动态，很多故障不是“持续坏”，而是短时抖动、瞬时拥塞、路径切换、策略误命中。如果没有回溯能力，排障就很容易沦为赛后猜谜。 这篇文章不讲空洞概念，直接从一线运维视角拆清楚：云上网络回溯分析系统到底该怎么建，应该覆盖哪些能力，落地时最容易踩哪些坑。 先说结论： 传统监控擅长发现“异常
Comments
Why I built another Ruby test runner inspired by Playwright Test Ruby already has great testing tools. If you are building Rails applications today, you probably use one of these combinations: RSpec + Capybara Minitest + Capybara Rails system tests Maybe Selenium, Cuprite, Ferrum, or Playwright through Ruby bindings These tools are mature, battle-tested, and widely used. So the natural question