Tbh I had no idea this was even a thing until recently. I've been working with Rails for a while now and somehow never came across it. So let me explain it the way I understood it. You know how we normally do associations in Rails, User has many Posts, Post belongs to User. Two different models, two different tables. Simple. But what if a model needs to reference itself? Like same table, same mode
Comments
We are currently witnessing a massive shift in AI development. We’ve moved past the "Chatbot" era and into the era of Agentic Systems—AI that doesn’t just suggest text, but actually executes code, moves money, and modifies databases. However, there is a fundamental architectural flaw in how most agents are built today: we are giving "Intelligence" and "Authority" to the same probabilistic model.
Why I built another Ruby test runner inspired by Playwright Test Ruby already has great testing tools. If you are building Rails applications today, you probably use one of these combinations: RSpec + Capybara Minitest + Capybara Rails system tests Maybe Selenium, Cuprite, Ferrum, or Playwright through Ruby bindings These tools are mature, battle-tested, and widely used. So the natural question
I was reading a Stripe tutorial last week and watched the author write amount: req.body.amount. That single line lets any user buy Premium for $1. It's also a common pattern in Stripe Checkout starter code. This post is about why, and how to make it impossible. You're building a paywalled product. You wire up Stripe Checkout, follow a popular tutorial, ship it. Looks great. Tests pass. Users are p