If you mostly live in .NET, the Java platform can look like a parallel universe: JVM, JDK, JARs, app servers, bytecode. The useful shortcut is to map each concept back to something you already know from C# and the CLR. This guide is a translation layer for .NET developers: what the JVM is, how the JDK compares to the .NET SDK, and what your real options are when a C# system needs to work with Java
Vibe coding is a good starting point, but it is not where serious AI-assisted development ends. The next step is agentic engineering: using AI coding agents inside a controlled engineering workflow, with context, tests, review and clear boundaries. Vibe coding often focuses on the generated output: Ask for feature -> get code -> run it -> ask for fixes Agentic engineering focuses on the system ar
Dapper vs. Entity Framework When building data-driven applications in .NET, two of the most popular data access technologies are Dapper and Entity Framework Core (EF Core). While both serve the same fundamental purpose—interacting with databases—they take very different approaches. Choosing between them depends heavily on your performance needs, development style, and project complexity. Let’s b
This post was created with AI assistance and reviewed for accuracy before publishing. Cursor can use project rules and documentation to steer behavior. Exact file names and mechanisms evolve; check Cursor documentation for the current layout (for example rules in .cursor or legacy .cursorrules patterns). Short, enforceable bullets beat long essays: stack versions, test commands, “no new dependenci
Vibe coding is one of those terms that sounds unserious until you notice how many people are actually doing it. The basic idea is simple: describe what you want, let an AI coding tool generate the implementation, run it, adjust the prompt, and keep going. It can feel magical. It can also go wrong very quickly. Vibe coding works best when the problem is visible and forgiving: small prototypes inter
My project is starting to get solid. I really like how it’s starting to look. Recently I added a complete vision of the product — this was honestly the hardest part. I’m trying to keep everything minimalistic. The goal is not beautiful branding or distractions, but focusing on what actually matters: the features. As I mentioned, here are the features: Capture HTTP requests & responses Inspect head
I spent the last few months building BlazOrbit, a component library for Blazor. It's not the first of its kind —MudBlazor, Radzen and Blazorise already exist— so I had to answer a hard question from the start: why does this need to exist? The answer turned out to be a set of architectural decisions I want to share, because each one taught me something about building UI frameworks that I didn't kno
If you're building an AI feature in .NET in 2026, the first framework you hear about is Microsoft Semantic Kernel. It's well-funded, actively maintained, and integrates deeply with Azure. For most projects, that's a fine starting point. But "fine for most" is not "right for all." Over the last few months we've talked to teams who started with Semantic Kernel and ended up looking for something else